You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children, adolescents, and adults: A randomized, controlled, phase III trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Vaccine, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.03.065 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Josefina B. Cadorna-Carlos, Terry Nolan, Charissa Fay Borja-Tabora, Jaime Santos, M. Cecilia Montalban, Ferdinandus J. de Looze, Peter Eizenberg, Stephen Hall, Martin Dupuy, Yanee Hutagalung, Stéphanie Pépin, Melanie Saville |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
France | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 18% |
Researcher | 12 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 21% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
Psychology | 5 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 17% |
Unknown | 24 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,695,810
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#12,957
of 16,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,611
of 282,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#174
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.