↓ Skip to main content

Particle retention in the forestomach of a browsing ruminant, the roe deerCapreolus capreolus

Overview of attention for article published in Mammal Research, March 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Particle retention in the forestomach of a browsing ruminant, the roe deerCapreolus capreolus
Published in
Mammal Research, March 2001
DOI 10.1007/bf03192422
Authors

Marcus Clauss, Matthias Lechner-Doll, Anke Behrend, Karin Lason, Denise Lang, Wolf J. Streich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 9%
Portugal 1 9%
Denmark 1 9%
Unknown 8 73%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Other 1 9%
Librarian 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 55%
Environmental Science 3 27%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Research
#606
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,012
of 42,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Research
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.