↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Novel Genetic Markers of Breast Cancer Survival

Overview of attention for article published in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of Novel Genetic Markers of Breast Cancer Survival
Published in
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, April 2015
DOI 10.1093/jnci/djv081
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qi Guo, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Peter Kraft, Sander Canisius, Constance Chen, Sofia Khan, Jonathan Tyrer, Manjeet K. Bolla, Qin Wang, Joe Dennis, Kyriaki Michailidou, Michael Lush, Siddhartha Kar, Jonathan Beesley, Alison M. Dunning, Mitul Shah, Kamila Czene, Hatef Darabi, Mikael Eriksson, Diether Lambrechts, Caroline Weltens, Karin Leunen, Stig E. Bojesen, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Sune F. Nielsen, Henrik Flyger, Jenny Chang-Claude, Anja Rudolph, Petra Seibold, Dieter Flesch-Janys, Carl Blomqvist, Kristiina Aittomäki, Rainer Fagerholm, Taru A. Muranen, Fergus J. Couch, Janet E. Olson, Celine Vachon, Irene L. Andrulis, Julia A. Knight, Gord Glendon, Anna Marie Mulligan, Annegien Broeks, Frans B. Hogervorst, Christopher A. Haiman, Brian E. Henderson, Fredrick Schumacher, Loic Le Marchand, John L. Hopper, Helen Tsimiklis, Carmel Apicella, Melissa C. Southey, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Malcolm W. R. Reed, Graham G. Giles, Roger L. Milne, Catriona McLean, Robert Winqvist, Katri Pylkäs, Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen, Mervi Grip, Maartje J. Hooning, Antoinette Hollestelle, John W. M. Martens, Ans M. W. van den Ouweland, Federik Marme, Andreas Schneeweiss, Rongxi Yang, Barbara Burwinkel, Jonine Figueroa, Stephen J. Chanock, Jolanta Lissowska, Elinor J. Sawyer, Ian Tomlinson, Michael J. Kerin, Nicola Miller, Hermann Brenner, Aida Karina Dieffenbach, Volker Arndt, Bernd Holleczek, Arto Mannermaa, Vesa Kataja, Veli-Matti Kosma, Jaana M. Hartikainen, Jingmei Li, Judith S. Brand, Keith Humphreys, Peter Devilee, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar, Caroline Seynaeve, Paolo Radice, Paolo Peterlongo, Bernardo Bonanni, Paolo Mariani, Peter A. Fasching, Matthias W. Beckmann, Alexander Hein, Arif B. Ekici, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Rosemary Balleine, Kelly-Anne Phillips, Javier Benitez, M. Pilar Zamora, Jose Ignacio Arias Perez, Primitiva Menéndez, Anna Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Katarzyna Jaworska-Bieniek, Katarzyna Durda, Ute Hamann, Maria Kabisch, Hans Ulrich Ulmer, Thomas Rüdiger, Sara Margolin, Vessela Kristensen, Silje Nord, D. Gareth Evans, Jean E. Abraham, Helena M. Earl, Louise Hiller, Janet A. Dunn, Sarah Bowden, Christine Berg, Daniele Campa, W. Ryan Diver, Susan M. Gapstur, Mia M. Gaudet, Susan E. Hankinson, Robert N. Hoover, Anika Hüsing, Rudolf Kaaks, Mitchell J. Machiela, Walter Willett, Myrto Barrdahl, Federico Canzian, Suet-Feung Chin, Carlos Caldas, David J. Hunter, Sara Lindstrom, Montserrat García-Closas, Per Hall, Douglas F. Easton, Diana M. Eccles, Nazneen Rahman, Heli Nevanlinna, Paul D. P. Pharoah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 128 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 19%
Professor 12 9%
Student > Master 11 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 11%
Computer Science 3 2%
Mathematics 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 29 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,861,361
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#1,843
of 7,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,439
of 282,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#39
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.