You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Beware of poor-quality MgO substrates: A study of MgO substrate quality and its effect on thin film quality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Crystal Growth, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.03.010 |
| Authors |
J.L. Schroeder, A.S. Ingason, J. Rosén, J. Birch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 25% |
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 19 | 32% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 13 | 22% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2015.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Crystal Growth
#303
of 6,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,796
of 281,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Crystal Growth
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,860 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.