↓ Skip to main content

Beyond Participation: Politics, Incommensurability and the Emergence of Mental Health Service Users’ Activism in Chile

Overview of attention for article published in Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 643)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
37 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Beyond Participation: Politics, Incommensurability and the Emergence of Mental Health Service Users’ Activism in Chile
Published in
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11013-018-9576-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristian R. Montenegro

Abstract

Although the organisation of mental health service users and ex-users in Latin America is a recent and under-researched phenomenon, global calls for their involvement in policy have penetrated national agendas, shaping definitions and expectations about their role in mental health systems. In this context, how such groups react to these expectations and define their own goals, strategies and partnerships can reveal the specificity of the "user movement" in Chile and Latin America. This study draws on Jacques Rancière's theorisation of "police order" and "politics" to understand the emergence of users' collective identity and activism, highlighting the role of practices of disengagement and rejection. It is based on interviews and participant observation with a collective of users, ex-users and professionals in Chile. The findings show how the group's aims and self-understandings evolved through hesitations and reflexive engagements with the legal system, the mental health system, and wider society. The notion of a "politics of incommensurability" is proposed to thread together a reflexive rejection of external expectations and definitions and the development of a sense of being "outside" of the intelligibility of the mental health system and its frameworks of observation and proximity. This incommensurability problematises a technical definition of users' presence and influence and the generalisation of abstract parameters of engagement, calling for approaches that address how these groups constitute themselves meaningfully in specific situations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 18%
Psychology 10 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,187,669
of 25,225,182 outputs
Outputs from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#34
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,637
of 332,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,182 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them