↓ Skip to main content

Association of gender to outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest – a report from the International Cardiac Arrest Registry

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Association of gender to outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest – a report from the International Cardiac Arrest Registry
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0904-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Viktor Karlsson, Josef Dankiewicz, Niklas Nielsen, Karl B Kern, Michael R Mooney, Richard R Riker, Sten Rubertsson, David B Seder, Pascal Stammet, Kjetil Sunde, Eldar Søreide, Barbara T Unger, Hans Friberg

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested an effect of gender on outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but the results are conflicting. We aimed to investigate the association of gender to outcome, coronary angiography (CAG) and adverse events in OHCA survivors treated with mild induced hypothermia (MIH). We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the International Cardiac Arrest Registry. Adult patients with a non-traumatic OHCA and treated with MIH were included. Good neurological outcome was defined as a cerebral performance category (CPC) of 1 or 2. A total of 1667 patients, 472 women (28%) and 1195 men (72%), met the inclusion criteria. Men were more likely to receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, have an initial shockable rhythm and to have a presumed cardiac cause of arrest. At hospital discharge, men had a higher survival rate (52% vs. 38%, p < 0.001) and more often a good neurological outcome (43% vs. 32%, p < 0.001) in the univariate analysis. When adjusting for baseline characteristics, male gender was associated with improved survival (OR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.01-1.78) but no longer with neurological outcome (OR 1.24, 95% CI: 0.92-1.67). Adverse events were common; women more often had hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia and bleeding requiring transfusion, while men had more pneumonia. In a subgroup analysis of patients with a presumed cardiac cause of arrest (n = 1361), men more often had CAG performed on admission (58% vs. 50%, p = 0.02) but this discrepancy disappeared in an adjusted analysis. Gender differences exist regarding cause of arrest, adverse events and outcome. Male gender was independently associated with survival but not with neurological outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 96 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 25 25%
Unknown 29 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Psychology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 31 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,749
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,880
of 395,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#394
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.