↓ Skip to main content

Estimating the chance of success in IVF treatment using a ranking algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Estimating the chance of success in IVF treatment using a ranking algorithm
Published in
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11517-015-1299-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Altay Güvenir, Gizem Misirli, Serdar Dilbaz, Ozlem Ozdegirmenci, Berfu Demir, Berna Dilbaz

Abstract

In medicine, estimating the chance of success for treatment is important in deciding whether to begin the treatment or not. This paper focuses on the domain of in vitro fertilization (IVF), where estimating the outcome of a treatment is very crucial in the decision to proceed with treatment for both the clinicians and the infertile couples. IVF treatment is a stressful and costly process. It is very stressful for couples who want to have a baby. If an initial evaluation indicates a low pregnancy rate, decision of the couple may change not to start the IVF treatment. The aim of this study is twofold, firstly, to develop a technique that can be used to estimate the chance of success for a couple who wants to have a baby and secondly, to determine the attributes and their particular values affecting the outcome in IVF treatment. We propose a new technique, called success estimation using a ranking algorithm (SERA), for estimating the success of a treatment using a ranking-based algorithm. The particular ranking algorithm used here is RIMARC. The performance of the new algorithm is compared with two well-known algorithms that assign class probabilities to query instances. The algorithms used in the comparison are Naïve Bayes Classifier and Random Forest. The comparison is done in terms of area under the ROC curve, accuracy and execution time, using tenfold stratified cross-validation. The results indicate that the proposed SERA algorithm has a potential to be used successfully to estimate the probability of success in medical treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 81 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 4 5%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 25 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Computer Science 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Engineering 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#522
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,597
of 279,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.