↓ Skip to main content

Enabling nutrient security and sustainability through systems research

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Nutrition, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Enabling nutrient security and sustainability through systems research
Published in
Genes & Nutrition, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12263-015-0462-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jim Kaput, Martin Kussmann, Yery Mendoza, Ronit Le Coutre, Karen Cooper, Anne Roulin

Abstract

Human and companion animal health depends upon nutritional quality of foods. Seed varieties, seasonal and local growing conditions, transportation, food processing, and storage, and local food customs can influence the nutrient content of food. A new and intensive area of investigation is emerging that recognizes many factors in these agri-food systems that influence the maintenance of nutrient quality which is fundamental to ensure nutrient security for world populations. Modeling how these systems function requires data from different sectors including agricultural, environmental, social, and economic, but also must incorporate basic nutrition and other biomedical sciences. Improving the agri-food system through advances in pre- and post-harvest processing methods, biofortification, or fortifying processed foods will aid in targeting nutrition for populations and individuals. The challenge to maintain and improve nutrient quality is magnified by the need to produce food locally and globally in a sustainable and consumer-acceptable manner for current and future populations. An unmet requirement for assessing how to improve nutrient quality, however, is the basic knowledge of how to define health. That is, health cannot be maintained or improved by altering nutrient quality without an adequate definition of what health means for individuals and populations. Defining and measuring health therefore becomes a critical objective for basic nutritional and other biomedical sciences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 87 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 21%
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Professor 7 8%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 37%
Environmental Science 11 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,553,433
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#317
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,647
of 243,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.