| Title |
Point-of-care hemoglobin A1c testing in postmortem examination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12024-018-9978-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joo-Young Na |
| Abstract |
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a good marker for monitoring glycemic control, and an elevated postmortem blood HbA1c level might indicate poor glycemic control during the antemortem period. The HbA1c level can be measured as a point-of-care (POC) test. In forensic medicine, POC testing is useful for performing autopsies and postmortem inspections since POC testing is both rapid and efficient. This study evaluated HbA1c levels in the capillary and cardiac venous blood of postmortem specimens as well as the usefulness of evaluating HbA1c levels as POC testing in postmortem examinations. For HbA1c testing performed on 103 autopsy cases, a portable SD A1cCare (test) was used for the POC testing, along with a Cobas Integra 800 (comparative). There was a strong correlation between HbA1c levels from postmortem capillary and cardiac venous blood (regression equation, 0.000 + 1.000×), and between HbA1c levels of cardiac venous blood measured using the portable SD A1cCare as a POC test and the Cobas Integra 800 (regression equation, -0.532 + 1.080×). HbA1c levels measured up to 4 weeks following the autopsy with the SD A1cCare had a tendency to decline. The author concluded that HbA1c POC testing can be used during postmortem inspection and during autopsy to accurately identify patients who had uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 30% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#21,697,638
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#679
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,958
of 330,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#22
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.