↓ Skip to main content

Numerical investigation of particle–blast interaction during explosive dispersal of liquids and granular materials

Overview of attention for article published in Shock Waves, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Numerical investigation of particle–blast interaction during explosive dispersal of liquids and granular materials
Published in
Shock Waves, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00193-018-0820-6
Authors

Q. Pontalier, M. Lhoumeau, A. M. Milne, A. W. Longbottom, D. L. Frost

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 36%
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 57%
Energy 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,604,390
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Shock Waves
#108
of 317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,303
of 326,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Shock Waves
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 317 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.