Title |
Thermal Infrared Imaging Experiments of C-Type Asteroid 162173 Ryugu on Hayabusa2
|
---|---|
Published in |
Space Science Reviews, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11214-016-0286-8 |
Authors |
Tatsuaki Okada, Tetsuya Fukuhara, Satoshi Tanaka, Makoto Taguchi, Takeshi Imamura, Takehiko Arai, Hiroki Senshu, Yoshiko Ogawa, Hirohide Demura, Kohei Kitazato, Ryosuke Nakamura, Toru Kouyama, Tomohiko Sekiguchi, Sunao Hasegawa, Tsuneo Matsunaga, Takehiko Wada, Jun Takita, Naoya Sakatani, Yamato Horikawa, Ken Endo, Jörn Helbert, Thomas G. Müller, Axel Hagermann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 18 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 27% |
Engineering | 11 | 18% |
Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 18% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#402
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,882
of 334,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.