| Title |
Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal Hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-011-1799-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Bittner, M. E. Arregui, T. Bisgaard, M. Dudai, G. S. Ferzli, R. J. Fitzgibbons, R. H. Fortelny, U. Klinge, F. Kockerling, E. Kuhry, J. Kukleta, D. Lomanto, M. C. Misra, A. Montgomery, S. Morales-Conde, W. Reinpold, J. Rosenberg, S. Sauerland, C. Schug-Paß, K. Singh, M. Timoney, D. Weyhe, P. Chowbey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| Colombia | 2 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Spain | 2 | 12% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Turkey | 1 | 6% |
| Iraq | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 41% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 35% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Morocco | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 336 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 13% |
| Other | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 89 | 25% |
| Unknown | 88 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 215 | 61% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Unknown | 91 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,571,789
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#132
of 5,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,145
of 116,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,984 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.