↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Elements of a theory for multiparton interactions in QCD

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions
Title
Erratum to: Elements of a theory for multiparton interactions in QCD
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/jhep03(2016)001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Diehl, Daniel Ostermeier, Andreas Schäfer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#19,087
of 25,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,588
of 316,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#552
of 578 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 578 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.