| Title |
Symptomatic reactions, clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction associated with upper cervical chiropractic care: A prospective, multicenter, cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-219 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kirk Eriksen, Roderic P Rochester, Eric L Hurwitz |
| Abstract |
Observational studies have previously shown that adverse events following manipulation to the neck and/or back are relatively common, although these reactions tend to be mild in intensity and self-limiting. However, no prospective study has examined the incidence of adverse reactions following spinal adjustments using upper cervical techniques, and the impact of this care on clinical outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 23% |
| Unknown | 34 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,234,337
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#188
of 4,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,332
of 146,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.