↓ Skip to main content

Kelvin–Helmholtz Instability: Lessons Learned and Ways Forward

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Kelvin–Helmholtz Instability: Lessons Learned and Ways Forward
Published in
Space Science Reviews, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11214-018-0505-6
Authors

A. Masson, K. Nykyri

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 13 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 15 36%
Engineering 7 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Energy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,591,858
of 25,193,883 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#163
of 1,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,031
of 332,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,193,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.