You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Can Rasch Analysis Enhance the Abstract Ranking Process in Scientific Conferences? Issues of Interrater Variability and Abstract Rating Burden
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/chp.21263 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Justin Newton Scanlan, Natasha A Lannin, Tammy Hoffmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 18% |
Researcher | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 18% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 9% |
Engineering | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals
#497
of 635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,377
of 277,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.