↓ Skip to main content

Factors Influencing the Prescribing Preferences of Physicians for Drug-Naive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Real-World Setting in Japan: Insight from a Web Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes Therapy, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Factors Influencing the Prescribing Preferences of Physicians for Drug-Naive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Real-World Setting in Japan: Insight from a Web Survey
Published in
Diabetes Therapy, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13300-018-0431-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroki Murayama, Kota Imai, Masato Odawara

Abstract

The Japanese guidelines for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) emphasize individualization of treatment based on patient need and encourage physicians to select an appropriate oral antidiabetes drug (OAD). However, limited evidence is available on the factors influencing the selection by physicians (diabetes specialists and nonspecialists) of the first-line OAD to treat drug-naive patients with T2DM. A survey was designed to explore the treatment factors and patient characteristics that influence physicians when they choose an initial OAD to prescribe to a drug-naive patient with T2DM in a real-world setting in Japan. The 25-min web-based online survey consisted of simple and focused multiple-choice questions, and was circulated to physicians across eight selected regions in Japan. The primary endpoints were the proportions of physicians who considered particular treatment factors and patient characteristics when selecting the appropriate treatment for drug-naive T2DM patients. A total of 491 physicians participated in the survey. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) were the most-preferred first-line OADs, followed by metformin, of both specialists (69% vs. 60%) and nonspecialists (73% vs. 47%). The most influential factors when a DPP-4i was selected were found to be glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), postprandial glucose (PPG)-lowering effect, and a low risk of hypoglycemia, which were considered by > 80% of physicians, whereas the key factors when metformin was selected were improvement in insulin resistance, low cost, low risk of hypoglycemia, and PPG- and HbA1c-lowering effects, which were considered by > 85% of physicians. Regression analysis revealed that the dominant reason for choosing DPP-4is over metformin was their ease of use in patients with renal impairment, whereas the dominant reasons for choosing metformin over DPP-4is were improvement in insulin resistance and low cost. The key patient characteristics driving the choice of DPP-4is or metformin as the first-line OAD by physicians were similar to those that influenced the treatment intensification decision (DPP-4is: PPG and renal function; metformin: age, BMI, insulin resistance, and renal function). In Japan, DPP-4is are the preferred first-line OADs, followed by metformin. The key treatment factors and patient characteristics considered when selecting DPP-4is or metformin are similar for both specialists and nonspecialists. These results may prompt further discussion of the differences in T2DM treatment between Japan and other counties. Novartis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 14 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Unspecified 3 9%
Psychology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 16 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2018.
All research outputs
#19,020,456
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes Therapy
#762
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,016
of 327,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes Therapy
#32
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.