↓ Skip to main content

On the Application of Acoustic Analogies in the Numerical Simulation of Human Phonation Process

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Scientific Research, Section B, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
On the Application of Acoustic Analogies in the Numerical Simulation of Human Phonation Process
Published in
Applied Scientific Research, Section B, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10494-018-9900-z
Authors

J. Valášek, M. Kaltenbacher, P. Sváček

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 44%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Mathematics 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Applied Scientific Research, Section B
#378
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,303
of 340,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Scientific Research, Section B
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.