↓ Skip to main content

Rien ne doit se faire pour eux sans eux : renforcer la participation des demandeurs d’asile, réfugiés et migrants sans statut et des organismes communautaires dans la recherche en santé

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Public Health, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Rien ne doit se faire pour eux sans eux : renforcer la participation des demandeurs d’asile, réfugiés et migrants sans statut et des organismes communautaires dans la recherche en santé
Published in
Canadian Journal of Public Health, April 2018
DOI 10.17269/s41997-018-0042-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilie Robert, Lisa Merry, Magalie Benoît, Daniel Boleira Guimaraes, Mónica Ruiz-Casares

Abstract

The number of vulnerable migrants in Canada is on the rise. While debates on immigration policies have been at the forefront, there has been little dialogue regarding the health and well-being of refugees, asylum-seekers and non-status migrants despite the significant health inequities that these populations face. In this context, health research that aims to understand migrants' realities, develop appropriate health and social services and policies, and empower these populations, is needed more than ever. Participatory action research (PAR) is one approach for conducting relevant and empowering research with migrants, however it remains underutilized due to inadequate funding, infrastructure and support. PAR addresses real-life challenges, emphasizes collaboration with communities, and involves all stakeholders, including community-based organizations, in the co-construction and implementation of practical solutions. In this commentary, we call for more research with and for migrants, particularly in the form of PAR, as well as for more targeted funding initiatives and research conditions (University, funding agencies) that foster and support this type of research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Unspecified 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Lecturer 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 29%
Unspecified 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,745,701
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Public Health
#373
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,226
of 327,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Public Health
#14
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.