↓ Skip to main content

The potential usefulness of taurine on diabetes mellitus and its complications

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The potential usefulness of taurine on diabetes mellitus and its complications
Published in
Amino Acids, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00726-011-0883-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Ito, Stephen W. Schaffer, Junichi Azuma

Abstract

Taurine (2-aminoethanesulfonic acid) is a free amino acid found ubiquitously in millimolar concentrations in all mammalian tissues. Taurine exerts a variety of biological actions, including antioxidation, modulation of ion movement, osmoregulation, modulation of neurotransmitters, and conjugation of bile acids, which may maintain physiological homeostasis. Recently, data is accumulating that show the effectiveness of taurine against diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance and its complications, including retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, atherosclerosis and cardiomyopathy, independent of hypoglycemic effect in several animal models. The useful effects appear due to the multiple actions of taurine on cellular functions. This review summarizes the beneficial effects of taurine supplementation on diabetes mellitus and the molecular mechanisms underlying its effectiveness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 155 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Bachelor 28 18%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 20 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,026,980
of 24,791,202 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#56
of 1,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,656
of 113,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,791,202 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.