↓ Skip to main content

Canadian Open Genetics Repository (COGR): a unified clinical genomics database as a community resource for standardising and sharing genetic interpretations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Genetics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Canadian Open Genetics Repository (COGR): a unified clinical genomics database as a community resource for standardising and sharing genetic interpretations
Published in
Journal of Medical Genetics, April 2015
DOI 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102933
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Marina Wang, Shana White, Matthew S Lebo, Ron Agatep, Peter Ainsworth, Mohammad R Akbari, Melyssa Aronson, Gary D Bader, Raveen Basran, Andre Blavier, Andrea Blumenthal, Kathleen Buckley, Jodi Campbell, Philippe M Campeau, Melanie Care, Nancy Carson, Ronald Carter, George Charames, David Chitayat, George Chong, Edmond Chouinard, Kathy Chun, Kenneth J Craddock, Rod Docking, Andrea Eisen, Hanna Faghfoury, Sandra Farrell, Harriet Feilotter, Bridget Fernandez, Cynthia Forster-Gibson, William Foulkes, Robert Hegele, Spring Holter, Sheri Horsburgh, Lauren Hughes, Stacey Hume, Franny Jewett, Aly Karsan, Sam Khalouei, Joan Knoll, Elena Kolomeitz, Georges Maire, Christian Marshall, Elizabeth McCready, Michael J Moorhouse, Chantal Morel, Tanya Nelson, Brian O'Connor, Francis Ouellette, Jillian Parboosingh, Peter Ray, Heidi Rehm, Christie Riddell, David S Rosenblatt, Andrea Ruchon, Bekim Sadikovic, Kara Semotiuk, Stephen W Scherer, Cheryl Shuman, Josh Silver, Katherine Siminovitch, Lesley Solomon-Izsak, Marsha Speevak, James Stavropoulos, Lincoln Stein, Rhonda Tannenbaum, Deborah Terespolsky, Richard F Wintle, Beatrix Wong, Nora Wong, John S Waye, Michael O Woods, Philip Wyatt, Sean Young

Abstract

The Canadian Open Genetics Repository is a collaborative effort for the collection, storage, sharing and robust analysis of variants reported by medical diagnostics laboratories across Canada. As clinical laboratories adopt modern genomics technologies, the need for this type of collaborative framework is increasingly important. A survey to assess existing protocols for variant classification and reporting was delivered to clinical genetics laboratories across Canada. Based on feedback from this survey, a variant assessment tool was made available to all laboratories. Each participating laboratory was provided with an instance of GeneInsight, a software featuring versioning and approval processes for variant assessments and interpretations and allowing for variant data to be shared between instances. Guidelines were established for sharing data among clinical laboratories and in the final outreach phase, data will be made readily available to patient advocacy groups for general use. The survey demonstrated the need for improved standardisation and data sharing across the country. A variant assessment template was made available to the community to aid with standardisation. Instances of the GeneInsight tool were provided to clinical diagnostic laboratories across Canada for the purpose of uploading, transferring, accessing and sharing variant data. As an ongoing endeavour and a permanent resource, the Canadian Open Genetics Repository aims to serve as a focal point for the collaboration of Canadian laboratories with other countries in the development of tools that take full advantage of laboratory data in diagnosing, managing and treating genetic diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 8%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 21%
Other 8 21%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 16%
Computer Science 4 11%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,586,375
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#369
of 2,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,890
of 265,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.