↓ Skip to main content

Equality, justice and feasibility: an ethical analysis of the WBGU’s budget approach

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Equality, justice and feasibility: an ethical analysis of the WBGU’s budget approach
Published in
Climatic Change, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1409-z
Authors

Fabian Schuppert, Christian Seidel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Denmark 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 14%
Energy 3 14%
Engineering 2 10%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,754,724
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#5,470
of 5,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,827
of 265,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#53
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.