| Title |
Deactivation of snares by wild chimpanzees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Primates, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10329-010-0212-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gaku Ohashi, Tetsuro Matsuzawa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 21% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 16% |
| Psychology | 8 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#746,675
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#63
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,019
of 94,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them