↓ Skip to main content

“We’d Be Free”: Narratives of Life Without Homophobia, Racism, or Sexism

Overview of attention for article published in Sexuality Research and Social Policy, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
“We’d Be Free”: Narratives of Life Without Homophobia, Racism, or Sexism
Published in
Sexuality Research and Social Policy, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13178-011-0063-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilan H. Meyer, Suzanne C. Ouellette, Rahwa Haile, Tracy A. McFarlane

Abstract

Stigma and social inequality deprive disadvantaged social groups of a sense of social well-being. Stress researchers have focused on prejudice-related events and conditions but have not described more intangible stressors experienced by sexual minorities. We use narrative methods to examine how sexual minorities experience stigma and social inequality as we focus on the more intangible stressors that are both pervasive and difficult to measure. Three themes emerged in the narratives of our ethnically diverse sample of 57 adult sexual minority women and men: (a) stigma deprived them of access to critical possibilities and opportunities; (b) stigma deprives them of safety and acceptance; and (c) despite this, the experience of stigma is also related to the adoption of a positive and collective orientation towards their stigmatized identities. Recognizing these stressors and related resilience can direct policy makers toward interventions that go even beyond eliminating prejudice by including goals to strengthen minority communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 139 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 32%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 31%
Social Sciences 43 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 29 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2013.
All research outputs
#14,034,420
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Sexuality Research and Social Policy
#366
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,993
of 123,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sexuality Research and Social Policy
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.