↓ Skip to main content

Resilience and Physical and Mental Well-Being in Adults with and Without HIV

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Resilience and Physical and Mental Well-Being in Adults with and Without HIV
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10461-017-1980-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer A. McGowan, James Brown, Fiona C. Lampe, Marc Lipman, Colette Smith, Alison Rodger

Abstract

Resilience has been related to improved physical and mental health, and is thought to improve with age. No studies have explored the relationship between resilience, ageing with HIV, and well-being. A cross sectional observational study performed on UK HIV positive (N = 195) and HIV negative adults (N = 130). Associations of both age and 'time diagnosed with HIV' with resilience (RS-14) were assessed, and the association of resilience with depression, anxiety symptoms (PHQ-9 and GAD-7), and problems with activities of daily living (ADLs) (Euroqol 5D-3L). In a multivariable model, HIV status overall was not related to resilience. However, longer time diagnosed with HIV was related to lower resilience, and older age showed a non-significant trend towards higher resilience. In adults with HIV, high resilience was related to a lower prevalence of depression, anxiety, and problems with ADLs. It may be necessary to consider resilience when exploring the well-being of adults ageing with HIV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 10 7%
Lecturer 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 54 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Psychology 8 6%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Unspecified 6 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 59 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,038,744
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#270
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,750
of 442,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#7
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.