| Title |
Neural Invasion is a Significant Contributor to Peritoneal Recurrence in Signet Ring Cell Gastric Carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-018-6371-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dakeun Lee, Sang-Yong Son, Young-Bae Kim, Sang-Uk Han, Hoon Hur |
| Abstract |
Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) has shown a favorable outcome in early stages but has a worse prognosis than non-SRC in advanced stages. However, the cause for this stage-dependent prognostic impact has not been determined. This study aimed to compare clinicopathologic features and recurrence patterns between gastric SRC and non-SRC in a cohort of Eastern patients. This study reviewed the prospectively collected data of 764 patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer from 2005 to 2008. The demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, disease-specific survival (DSS) rate, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate of the patients were analyzed. The SRC patients (n = 176) had a worse prognosis than the non-SRC patients (n = 588), especially in stages T3 and T4. Peritoneal recurrence and the incidence of neural invasion (NI) were significantly increased in the SRC patients, albeit only in stages T3 and T4. In the T3 and T4 patients with NI, peritoneal recurrence occurred more frequently in SRC than in non-SRC (28.7% vs. 13.7%; p = 0.001), but not in the T3 and T4 patients without NI. Only in the patients with NI, SRC led to a significantly shorter DSS (67.6 vs. 90.7 months; p = 0.008) and RFS (67.1 vs. 80.3 months; p = 0.036) than non-SRC. This report is the first to present the relationship between NI and peritoneal recurrence as the cause of stage-dependent prognoses for SRC. A better understanding of NI may lend insight into cancer spread and recurrence, especially in gastric SRC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| India | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 22% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2018.
All research outputs
#13,077,497
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3,642
of 6,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,321
of 474,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#63
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.