↓ Skip to main content

Impairment of exogenous lactate clearance in experimental hyperdynamic septic shock is not related to total liver hypoperfusion

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Impairment of exogenous lactate clearance in experimental hyperdynamic septic shock is not related to total liver hypoperfusion
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0928-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pablo Tapia, Dagoberto Soto, Alejandro Bruhn, Leyla Alegría, Nicolás Jarufe, Cecilia Luengo, Eduardo Kattan, Tomás Regueira, Arturo Meissner, Rodrigo Menchaca, María Ignacia Vives, Nicolas Echeverría, Gustavo Ospina-Tascón, Jan Bakker, Glenn Hernández

Abstract

Although the prognostic value of persistent hyperlactatemia in septic shock is unequivocal, its physiological determinants are controversial. Particularly, the role of impaired hepatic clearance has been underestimated and considered relevant only in patients with liver ischemia or cirrhosis. Our objectives were to establish if endotoxemia impairs whole body net lactate clearance, and to explore a potential role for total liver hypoperfusion during the early phase of septic shock. After anesthesia twelve sheep were subjected to a hemodynamic/perfusion monitoring including hepatic and portal catheterization, and a hepatic ultrasound flow probe. After stabilization (point A), sheep were alternatively assigned to LPS (5 mcg/kg bolus followed by 4 mcg/kg/h) or sham for a 3 h study period. After 60 min of shock, animals were fluid resuscitated to normalize MAP. Repeated series of measurements were performed immediately after fluid resuscitation (point B), and one (point C) and two hours later (point D). Monitoring included systemic and regional hemodynamics, blood gases and lactate measurements, and ex-vivo hepatic mitochondrial respiration at point D. Parallel exogenous lactate and sorbitol clearances were performed at points B and D. In both cases the procedure included an IV bolus followed by serial blood sampling to draw a curve using the least squares method. A significant hyperlactatemia was already present in LPS as compared to sham animals at point B (4.7 [3.1-6.7] vs. 1.8 [1.5-3.7] mmol/L) increasing to 10.2 [7.8-12.3] mmol/L at point D. A significant increase in portal and hepatic lactate levels in LPS animals was also observed. However, no difference in hepatic DO2, VO2 or O2 extraction, total hepatic blood flow (915 [773-1046] vs. 655 [593-1175] ml/min at point D), mitochondrial respiration, liver enzymes or sorbitol clearance within groups was found. However, there was a highly significant decrease in lactate clearance in LPS animals (point B: 46 [30-180] vs. 1212 [743-2116] ml/min, p < 0.01; point D: 113 [65-322] vs. 944 [363-1235] ml/min, p < 0.01). Endotoxemia induces an early and severe impairment in lactate clearance that is not related to total liver hypoperfusion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 12 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,469
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,855
of 395,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#455
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.