↓ Skip to main content

Preparation, manipulation, and pulse strategy for one-dimensional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (ODPFGE)

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biotechnology, August 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Preparation, manipulation, and pulse strategy for one-dimensional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (ODPFGE)
Published in
Molecular Biotechnology, August 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf02907469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaan Noolandi, Chantal Turmel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 75%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 75%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,554,540
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biotechnology
#280
of 976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,182
of 23,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biotechnology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 976 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.