| Title |
Dynamic response of a dip slope with multi-slip planes revealed by shaking table tests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landslides, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10346-018-0992-2 |
| Authors |
Hung-Hui Li, Cheng-Han Lin, Wei Zu, Chi-Chieh Chen, Meng-Chia Weng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 8 | 36% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2018.
All research outputs
#5,749,089
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#128
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,515
of 326,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.