↓ Skip to main content

Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of Serelaxin in Japanese Patients With Acute Heart Failure

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of Serelaxin in Japanese Patients With Acute Heart Failure
Published in
Circulation Journal, April 2015
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-15-0227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoki Sato, Wataru Takahashi, Atsushi Hirayama, Masayoshi Ajioka, Naoto Takahashi, Kaoru Okishige, XingLi Wang, Akio Maki, Hideki Maruyama, Ursula Ebinger, Masayuki Yamaguchi, Yinuo Pang, Hiroki Matsumoto, Masatoshi Kawana

Abstract

Serelaxin, a recombinant form of human relaxin-2, is in development for treating acute heart failure (AHF) and a Phase II study in Japanese AHF patients was conducted.Methods and Results:A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of serelaxin at 10 and 30 µg·kg(-1)·day(-1)continuous intravenous infusion for up to 48 h, added to standard care for Japanese AHF patients. Primary endpoints were adverse events (AEs) through Day 5, serious AEs (SAEs) through Day 14, and serelaxin pharmacokinetics. Secondary endpoints included changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and cardiorenal biomarkers. A total of 46 patients received the study drug and were followed for 60 days. The observed AE profile was comparable between the groups, with no AEs of concern. Dose-dependent increase in the serum concentration of serelaxin was observed across the 2 dose rates of serelaxin. A greater reduction in SBP was observed with serelaxin 30 µg·kg(-1)·day(-1)vs. placebo (-7.7 [-16.4, 1.0] mmHg). A greater reduction in NT-proBNP was noted with serelaxin (-50.8% and -54.9% for 10 and 30 µg·kg(-1)·day(-1), respectively at Day 2). Serelaxin was well tolerated in this study with Japanese AHF patients, with no AEs of concern and favorable beneficial trends on efficacy. These findings support further evaluation of serelaxin 30 µg·kg(-1)·day(-1)in this patient population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 25 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 27 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#478
of 2,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,164
of 279,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#8
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.