↓ Skip to main content

Subclinical hypothyroidism: new trials, old caveats

Overview of attention for article published in Hormones international journal of endocrinology and metabolism, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Subclinical hypothyroidism: new trials, old caveats
Published in
Hormones international journal of endocrinology and metabolism, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s42000-018-0004-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faiza Lamine, Sara De Giorgi, Laura Marino, Marina Michalaki, Gerasimos P. Sykiotis

Abstract

The indications for levothyroxine replacement therapy for subclinical hypothyroidism (SH) remain a subject of debate, especially when prescribed for older adults. The results of the recent TRUST trial indicate that levothyroxine does not improve clinical symptom scores among elderly patients with SH. While there is much concern regarding the dilemma of introducing or withholding levothyroxine, less attention may be paid to the differential diagnosis of an elevated TSH level, which is the prerequisite for diagnosing SH. Herein, we review these issues facing endocrinologists and internists/generalists either in practice or in training. When a patient presents abnormal thyroid test results compatible with SH, a series of issues need to be addressed before the implementation of replacement therapy is considered: first, an isolated TSH elevation not linked to a primary thyroid pathology should be excluded; second, the persistent nature of the patient's TSH elevation and SH profile should be verified; third, SH symptoms and potential complications relevant for the specific patient should be documented; fourth, expectations from levothyroxine substitution therapy for SH in the specific patient should be clarified. Only then can the decision be made whether levothyroxine substitution should be introduced or not.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 50%
Psychology 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,175,718
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Hormones international journal of endocrinology and metabolism
#206
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,360
of 339,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hormones international journal of endocrinology and metabolism
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.