↓ Skip to main content

Routine Pathology and Postoperative Follow‐Up are Not Cost‐Effective in Cholecystectomy for Benign Gallbladder Disease

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Routine Pathology and Postoperative Follow‐Up are Not Cost‐Effective in Cholecystectomy for Benign Gallbladder Disease
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00268-018-4619-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pim B. Olthof, Madelon J. H. Metman, Ronald R. de Krijger, Joris J. Scheepers, Daphne Roos, Jan Willem T. Dekker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Researcher 2 9%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 9 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,725,788
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,131
of 4,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,476
of 343,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#17
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.