↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Stem Cells for Reconstructing the Lower Urinary Tracts.

Overview of attention for article published in Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Stem Cells for Reconstructing the Lower Urinary Tracts.
Published in
Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy, January 2018
DOI 10.2174/1574888x13666180426113907
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niall F Davis, Eoghan M Cunnane, John J Mulvihill, Mark R Quinlan, Damien M Bolton, Michael T Walsh, Gregory S Jack

Abstract

The urinary bladder and urethra comprise the lower urinary tracts. Pathological conditions that affect both structures necessitate reconstructive urological intervention with autologous tissue sources that cause neuromechanical and metabolic complications. Stem-cell therapies may offer an attractive alternative as they can replicate important host derived cellular functions such as mitosis, proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. To provide an overview on the application of stem cell therapies for regenerating the lower urinary tracts and to discuss factors that need to be addressed before stem-cells can be reliably introduced into clinical urological practice. Advantages of stem cells in reconstructive urology are their ability to self-renew and their durability. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and adult stem cells (ASCs) demonstrate excellent urological regenerative properties. Repairing defective lower urinary tract structures with various stem-cell derived therapies has been widely reported with encouraging results in vitro and in pre-clinical in vivo trials. Ethical considerations, cost, regulation, manufacturing and reimbursement need to be fully transparent before stem-cells are routinely applied to urological patients. International collaboration with consensus guidelines should be considered to facilitate standards that allow safe use of stem-cell therapies in urology. Stem cells therapies in urology are developing rapidly with many important achievements to date. Despite promising in vitro and pre-clinical data; implementation of stem cells into daily urological practice is not imminent. Further investigation is required to determine whether stem-cells will provide better clinical outcomes than current urological tissue replacement strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Researcher 2 3%
Student > Master 2 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 51 84%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Philosophy 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 53 87%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#254
of 372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#389,382
of 449,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 372 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.