↓ Skip to main content

Extending the clinical and genetic spectrum of ARID2 related intellectual disability. A case series of 7 patients

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Medical Genetics, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extending the clinical and genetic spectrum of ARID2 related intellectual disability. A case series of 7 patients
Published in
European Journal of Medical Genetics, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.04.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriella Gazdagh, Moira Blyth, Ingrid Scurr, Peter D. Turnpenny, Sarju G. Mehta, Ruth Armstrong, Meriel McEntagart, Ruth Newbury-Ecob, Edward S. Tobias, DDD Study, Shelagh Joss

Abstract

In the last 3 years de novo sequence variants in the ARID2 (AT-rich interaction domain 2) gene, a subunit of the SWI/SNF complex, have been linked to intellectual disabilities in 3 case reports including one which describes frameshift mutations in ARID2 in 2 patients with features resembling Coffin-Siris syndrome. Coffin-Siris syndrome (CSS) is a rare congenital syndrome characterized by intellectual deficit, coarse facial features and hypoplastic or absent fifth fingernails and/or toenails among other features. Mutations in a number of different genes encoding SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex proteins have been described but the underlying molecular cause remains unknown in approximately 40% of patients with CSS. Here we describe 7 unrelated individuals, 2 with deletions of the ARID2 region and 5 with de novo truncating mutations in the ARID2 gene. Similarities to CSS are evident. Although hypertrichosis and hypoplasia of the fifth finger nail and distal phalanx do not appear to be common in these patients, toenail hypoplasia and the presence of Wormian bones might support the involvement of ARID2.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 17 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,498,682
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Medical Genetics
#130
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,860
of 340,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Medical Genetics
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.