↓ Skip to main content

miRNA contents of cerebrospinal fluid extracellular vesicles in glioblastoma patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
miRNA contents of cerebrospinal fluid extracellular vesicles in glioblastoma patients
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11060-015-1784-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johnny C. Akers, Valya Ramakrishnan, Ryan Kim, Shirley Phillips, Vivek Kaimal, Ying Mao, Wei Hua, Isaac Yang, Chia-Chun Fu, John Nolan, Ichiro Nakano, Yuanfan Yang, Martin Beaulieu, Bob S. Carter, Clark C. Chen

Abstract

Analysis of extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from plasma or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has emerged as a promising biomarker platform for therapeutic monitoring in glioblastoma patients. However, the contents of the various subpopulations of EVs in these clinical specimens remain poorly defined. Here we characterize the relative abundance of miRNA species in EVs derived from the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of glioblastoma patients. EVs were isolated from glioblastoma cell lines as well as the plasma and CSF of glioblastoma patients. The microvesicle subpopulation was isolated by pelleting at 10,000×g for 30 min after cellular debris was cleared by a 2000×g (20 min) spin. The exosome subpopulation was isolated by pelleting the microvesicle supernatant at 120,000×g (120 min). qRT-PCR was performed to examine the distribution of miR-21, miR-103, miR-24, and miR-125. Global miRNA profiling was performed in select glioblastoma CSF samples. In plasma and cell line derived EVs, the relative abundance of miRNAs in exosome and microvesicles were highly variable. In some specimens, the majority of the miRNA species were found in exosomes while in other, they were found in microvesicles. In contrast, CSF exosomes were enriched for miRNAs relative to CSF microvesicles. In CSF, there is an average of one molecule of miRNA per 150-25,000 EVs. Most EVs derived from clinical biofluids are devoid of miRNA content. The relative distribution of miRNA species in plasma exosomes or microvesicles is unpredictable. In contrast, CSF exosomes are the major EV compartment that harbor miRNAs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 160 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 20%
Researcher 29 18%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 37 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 16%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 38 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,204,345
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,923
of 3,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,600
of 279,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#21
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,259 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.