| Title |
Australian acacias: weeds or useful trees?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-012-0243-8 |
| Authors |
Tim Low |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,457,701
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,183
of 2,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,892
of 164,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.