Title |
Vertical Subperiosteal Mid-face-lift for Treatment of Malar Festoons
|
---|---|
Published in |
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00266-010-9650-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Johannes Franz Hoenig, Daniel Knutti, Antonio de la Fuente |
Abstract |
Malar mounds may be accentuated by chronic lid edema, with the development from malar edema to malar mounds and finally to malar festoons. Because standard techniques do not seem effective and not specifically proposed for the treatment of malar festoons, subperiosteal vertical upper-midface lift associated with lower blepharoplasty overcomes these shortcomings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 35 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 7 | 19% |
Researcher | 6 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 16% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 81% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,166,280
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#257
of 1,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,510
of 120,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.