↓ Skip to main content

Concussion under-reporting and pressure from coaches, teammates, fans, and parents

Overview of attention for article published in Social Science & Medicine, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
287 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
471 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Concussion under-reporting and pressure from coaches, teammates, fans, and parents
Published in
Social Science & Medicine, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Kroshus, Bernice Garnett, Matt Hawrilenko, Christine M. Baugh, Jerel P. Calzo

Abstract

Concussions from sport present a substantial public health burden given the number of youth, adolescent and emerging adult athletes that participate in contact or collision sports. Athletes who fail to report symptoms of a suspected concussion and continue play are at risk of worsened symptomatology and potentially catastrophic neurologic consequences if another impact is sustained during this vulnerable period. Understanding why athletes do or do not report their symptoms is critical for developing efficacious strategies for risk reduction. Psychosocial theories and frameworks that explicitly incorporate context, as a source of expectations about the outcomes of reporting and as a source of behavioral reinforcement, are useful in framing this problem. The present study quantifies the pressure that athletes experience to continue playing after a head impact-from coaches, teammates, parents, and fans-and assesses how this pressure, both independently and as a system, is related to future concussion reporting intention. Participants in the study were 328 male and female athletes from 19 teams competing in one of seven sports (soccer, lacrosse, basketball, softball, baseball, volleyball, field hockey) at four colleges in the northeast region of the United States. Results found that more than one-quarter of the sample had experienced pressure from at least one source to continue playing after a head impact during the previous year. Results of a latent profile mixture model indicated that athletes who experienced pressure from all four of the measured sources were significantly more likely to intend to continue playing in the future than were athletes who had not experienced pressure from all sources, or only pressure from coaches and teammates. These findings underscore the importance of designing interventions that address the system in which athletes make decisions about concussion reporting, including athletes' parents, rather than focusing solely on modifying the individual's reporting cognitions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 471 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 464 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 83 18%
Student > Master 71 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 13%
Researcher 44 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 7%
Other 74 16%
Unknown 108 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 17%
Sports and Recreations 67 14%
Psychology 44 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 9%
Neuroscience 32 7%
Other 76 16%
Unknown 128 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#499,101
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Social Science & Medicine
#432
of 11,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,659
of 279,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science & Medicine
#8
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.