| Title |
Maxillofacial reconstruction using custom-made artificial bones fabricated by inkjet printing technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Artificial Organs, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10047-009-0462-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hideto Saijo, Kazuyo Igawa, Yuki Kanno, Yoshiyuki Mori, Kayoko Kondo, Koutaro Shimizu, Shigeki Suzuki, Daichi Chikazu, Mitsuki Iino, Masahiro Anzai, Nobuo Sasaki, Ung-il Chung, Tsuyoshi Takato |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 20% |
| Engineering | 33 | 20% |
| Materials Science | 18 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,554,540
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Artificial Organs
#60
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,318
of 93,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Artificial Organs
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.