↓ Skip to main content

Sitting versus standing makes a difference in musculoskeletal discomfort and postural load for surgeons performing vaginal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Sitting versus standing makes a difference in musculoskeletal discomfort and postural load for surgeons performing vaginal surgery
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00192-018-3619-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruchira Singh, Ladin A. Yurteri-Kaplan, Melissa M. Morrow, Amy L. Weaver, Michaela E. McGree, Xinhui Zhu, Victor L. Paquet, John B. Gebhart, Susan Hallbeck

Abstract

We compared musculoskeletal discomfort and postural load among surgeons in sitting and standing positions during vaginal surgery. Assessment of discomfort and posture of the primary surgeons in both positions was performed at two institutions. The primary outcome was an increase in body discomfort score after surgery as determined from subjective responses using validated tools. The secondary outcome was the percentage of time spent in awkward body postures measured objectively and stratified into awkward postures for neck, trunk, and bilateral shoulder angles. Variables were compared between sitting and standing positions using Fisher's exact test for primary outcomes and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for secondary outcomes. Data were collected for 24 surgeries from four surgeons in sitting position and nine surgeries from nine surgeons in standing position. The standing surgeons reported a significant increase in discomfort postoperatively for bilateral wrists, thighs, and lower legs compared with the sitting surgeons. The median percentage of time spent in awkward postures was significantly lower for the trunk in the standing versus sitting position (median 0.3% vs 58.8%, p < 0.001) but was significantly higher for both shoulders in the standing versus the sitting position (right shoulder: median 17.8% vs 0.3%, p = 0.003; left shoulder: median 7.4% vs 0.2%, p = 0.003). Surgeons reported more discomfort in when performing vaginal surgery while standing. The postural load was worse for trunk but favorable for bilateral shoulders when seated. Such differences may impact a surgeon's decision to perform vaginal surgery seated rather than standing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Engineering 7 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,175,718
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#1,582
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,972
of 340,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#32
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.