You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why AI Doomsayers are Like Sceptical Theists and Why it Matters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Minds and Machines, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11023-015-9365-y |
| Authors |
John Danaher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 14 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,760,822
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Minds and Machines
#66
of 337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,541
of 280,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minds and Machines
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.