You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of aromatherapy massage with music on the stress and anxiety levels of emergency nurses: comparison between summer and winter
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Nursing, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01709.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie Cooke, Kerri Holzhauser, Mark Jones, Cathy Davis, Julie Finucane |
| Abstract |
This research aimed to evaluate the use of aromatherapy massage and music as an intervention to cope with the occupational stress and anxiety that emergency department staff experience. The study also aimed to compare any differences in results between a summer and winter 12-week massage plan. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 202 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Researcher | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 24% |
| Unknown | 55 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 15% |
| Psychology | 26 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 63 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,417,478
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#566
of 5,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,316
of 79,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.