Title |
Spizaetus hawk-eagles as predators of arboreal colobines
|
---|---|
Published in |
Primates, February 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10329-011-0240-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S. D. Fam, V. Nijman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Slovenia | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 32% |
Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 60% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,131,204
of 25,099,766 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#477
of 1,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,577
of 112,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,099,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.