↓ Skip to main content

Microbiome analysis and bacterial isolation from Lejía Lake soil in Atacama Desert

Overview of attention for article published in Extremophiles, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 801)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Microbiome analysis and bacterial isolation from Lejía Lake soil in Atacama Desert
Published in
Extremophiles, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00792-018-1027-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dinka Mandakovic, Jonathan Maldonado, Rodrigo Pulgar, Pablo Cabrera, Alexis Gaete, Viviana Urtuvia, Michael Seeger, Verónica Cambiazo, Mauricio González

Abstract

As a consequence of the severe climatic change affecting our entire world, many lakes in the Andes Cordillera are likely to disappear within a few decades. One of these lakes is Lejía Lake, located in the central Atacama Desert. The objectives of this study were: (1) to characterize the bacterial community from Lejía Lake shore soil (LLS) using 16S rRNA sequencing and (2) to test a culture-based approach using a soil extract medium (SEM) to recover soil bacteria. This extreme ecosystem was dominated by three phyla: Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Firmicutes with 29.2, 28.2 and 28.1% of the relative abundance, respectively. Using SEM, we recovered 7.4% of the operational taxonomic units from LLS, all of which belonged to the same three dominant phyla from LLS (6.9% of Bacteroidetes, 77.6% of Proteobacteria, and 15.3% of Firmicutes). In addition, we used SEM to recover isolates from LLS and supplemented the culture medium with increasing salt concentrations to isolate microbial representatives of salt tolerance (Halomonas spp.). The results of this study complement the list of microbial taxa diversity from the Atacama Desert and assess a pipeline to isolate selective bacteria that could represent useful elements for biotechnological approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,905,300
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Extremophiles
#41
of 801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,856
of 326,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extremophiles
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 801 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.