| Title |
Circulating Tumor Cells in Lung Cancer: Detection Methods and Clinical Applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lung, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00408-015-9697-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Na Yu, Jia Zhou, Fang Cui, Xiaokui Tang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 27% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 22% |
| Engineering | 9 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,713,936
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#96
of 885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,189
of 255,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.