You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ISSN exercise & sport nutrition review: research & recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-7-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard B Kreider, Colin D Wilborn, Lem Taylor, Bill Campbell, Anthony L Almada, Rick Collins, Mathew Cooke, Conrad P Earnest, Mike Greenwood, Douglas S Kalman, Chad M Kerksick, Susan M Kleiner, Brian Leutholtz, Hector Lopez, Lonnie M Lowery, Ron Mendel, Abbie Smith, Marie Spano, Robert Wildman, Darryn S Willoughby, Tim N Ziegenfuss, Jose Antonio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 12% |
| Spain | 16 | 12% |
| United States | 15 | 11% |
| Japan | 7 | 5% |
| Mexico | 5 | 4% |
| Ireland | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 99 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 17% |
| Scientists | 14 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,564 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 14 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| United States | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Poland | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1497 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 391 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 310 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 122 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 109 | 7% |
| Researcher | 90 | 6% |
| Other | 267 | 17% |
| Unknown | 275 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 380 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 292 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 189 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 162 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 3% |
| Other | 181 | 12% |
| Unknown | 309 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 251. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#150,443
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#60
of 952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,622
of 447,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#60
of 857 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 857 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.