| Title |
Exploration of genetic diversity within Cichoriumendivia and Cichorium intybus with focus on the gene pool of industrial chicory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10722-015-0244-4 |
| Authors |
P. Raulier, O. Maudoux, C. Notté, X. Draye, P. Bertin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,930,776
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#75
of 715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,894
of 264,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.