| Title |
Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-013-3012-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Junqiang Lei, Pin Yang, Li Zhang, Yinzhong Wang, Kehu Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| India | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 31 | 26% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 43% |
| Engineering | 15 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,182,051
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#867
of 4,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,716
of 197,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.