↓ Skip to main content

The interaction of carbon nanotubes with an in vitro blood-brain barrier model and mouse brain in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Materials, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The interaction of carbon nanotubes with an in vitro blood-brain barrier model and mouse brain in vivo
Published in
Clinical Materials, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.083
Pubmed ID
Authors

Houmam Kafa, Julie Tzu-Wen Wang, Noelia Rubio, Kerrie Venner, Glenn Anderson, Elzbieta Pach, Belén Ballesteros, Jane E. Preston, N. Joan Abbott, Khuloud T. Al-Jamal

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are a novel nanocarriers with interesting physical and chemical properties. Here we investigate the ability of amino-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs-NH3(+)) to cross the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) in vitro using a co-culture BBB model comprising primary porcine brain endothelial cells (PBEC) and primary rat astrocytes, and in vivo following a systemic administration of radiolabelled f-MWNTs. Transmission Electron microscopy (TEM) confirmed that MWNTs-NH3(+) crossed the PBEC monolayer via energy-dependent transcytosis. MWNTs-NH3(+) were observed within endocytic vesicles and multi-vesicular bodies after 4 and 24 h. A complete crossing of the in vitro BBB model was observed after 48 h, which was further confirmed by the presence of MWNTs-NH3(+) within the astrocytes. MWNT-NH3(+) that crossed the PBEC layer was quantitatively assessed using radioactive tracers. A maximum transport of 13.0 ± 1.1% after 72 h was achieved using the co-culture model. f-MWNT exhibited significant brain uptake (1.1  ±  0.3% injected dose/g) at 5 min after intravenous injection in mice, after whole body perfusion with heparinized saline. Capillary depletion confirmed presence of f-MWNT in both brain capillaries and parenchyma fractions. These results could pave the way for use of CNTs as nanocarriers for delivery of drugs and biologics to the brain, after systemic administration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 179 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 41 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 8%
Chemistry 15 8%
Materials Science 11 6%
Other 45 25%
Unknown 52 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,863,433
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Materials
#334
of 10,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,421
of 279,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Materials
#11
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.