↓ Skip to main content

Ki-67 expression in sclerosing adenosis and adjacent normal breast terminal ductal lobular units: a nested case–control study from the Mayo Benign Breast Disease Cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Ki-67 expression in sclerosing adenosis and adjacent normal breast terminal ductal lobular units: a nested case–control study from the Mayo Benign Breast Disease Cohort
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10549-015-3370-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aziza Nassar, Tanya L. Hoskin, Melody L. Stallings-Mann, Amy C. Degnim, Derek C. Radisky, Marlene H. Frost, Robert A. Vierkant, Lynn C. Hartmann, Daniel W. Visscher

Abstract

Sclerosing adenosis (SA) increases risk for invasive breast cancer (BC) 2.1 times relative to that in the general population. Here, we sought to evaluate whether the proliferation marker Ki-67 stratifies risk among women with SA. A nested case-control sample of patients with SA was obtained from the Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease Cohort. Ki-67 expression was evaluated in SA lesions and in the adjacent normal terminal duct lobular units (TDLU) in women who did (cases, n = 133) or did not (controls, n = 239) develop BC. Ki-67 was scored by intensity and number of positively stained cells per one high-power field (magnification, ×40) (40× HPF) for both SA and normal TDLU. Associations of Ki-67 expression with case-control status were assessed using conditional logistic regression. Higher Ki-67 expression was significantly associated with case-control status in both SA (P = 0.03) and normal background TDLU (P = 0.006). For the SA lesion, >2 average positively stained cells/40× HPF showed an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.9 (95 % CI, 1.1-3.4) compared to samples with an average of ≤2 positively stained cells. For background TDLU, lobules with >2 but ≤6 average positively stained cells showed an adjusted OR of 1.3-1.5, whereas those with an average of >6 positively stained cells had an OR of 2.4 (95 % CI, 1.1-5.3) compared to those with an average of <2 positively stained cells. Among women with SA, increased Ki-67 expression in either the SA lesion or the normal background TDLU carried an approximately twofold increased odds of subsequent BC as compared to lower Ki-67 expression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 73%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2015.
All research outputs
#14,681,630
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3,166
of 4,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,727
of 264,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#44
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.